Abstract:【Objective】 To explore clinical effect, safety, advantages and disadvantages of interstitial tubal pregnancy treated with laparoscope using hypophysin or oxytocin compared with laparotomy. 【Methods】 61 cases diagnosed with interstitial tubal pregnancy in our hospital were treated with laparoscopic incision in embryo form May, 2009 to October, 2013. 37 patients were in hypophysin group treated with multipoint injection of hypophysin around enclosed mass with laparoscopic. 29 patients were in oxytocin group treated with multipoint injection of oxytocin around enclosed mass with laparoscopic.The differences of operation time, blood loss, postoperative morbidity, time needed for passage of gas by anus, hospital stay, incidence rate of persistent ectopic pregnancy were compared .between the two groups .【Results】 The operation success rate of hypophysin group is 100%, was significantly higher than that in oxytocin group (P <0.01). There is significant difference of operation time and blood loss between hypophysin group and oxytocin group (P <0.05). There is no difference of postoperative morbidity and incidence rate of persistent ectopic pregnancy between two groups (P >0.05). 【Conclusion】 It's a safe, effective and minimally invasive way of opening-taking embryo operation of interstitial tubal pregnancy by laparoscope. Application of hypophysin injection in opening-taking embryo by laparoscopic operation on lump interstitial tubal pregnancies can reduce blood loss, shorten operation time, which is better than oxytocin.