柔性臂消化内镜手术机器人在食管内镜黏膜下剥离术中的应用效果
作者:
作者单位:

山东大学齐鲁医院 消化内科,山东 济南 250012

作者简介:

李清敏,就职于高密市人民医院消化内科

通讯作者:

季锐,E-mail:qljirui@163.com

基金项目:

泰山学者青年专家经费资助(No:tsqn202312333)


Application of flexible auxiliary single-arm transluminal endoscopic robot in esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection
Author:
Affiliation:

Department of Gastroenterology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    目的 比较柔性臂消化内镜手术机器人(FASTER)辅助食管内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)和传统食管ESD的临床效果,以探索更安全、高效的ESD手术方法。方法 分别采用FASTER辅助ESD和传统ESD方法在离体猪食管模型中进行手术操作。对比分析两组手术总时间、ESD时间、直视剥离率、整体切除率和并发症发生率的差异。结果 FASTER辅助ESD组的手术总时间[(19.2±2.9)和(28.9±8.2)min]和ESD时间[(13.0±2.9)和(21.6±8.3)min]明显短于传统ESD组,差异均有统计学意义(P < 0.01);直视剥离率明显高于传统ESD组(96.2%和65.4%),差异有统计学意义(P = 0.014);肌层损伤率明显低于传统ESD组(19.2%和69.2%),差异有统计学意义(P < 0.01)。两组完整切除率和穿孔率比较,差异均无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。这些优势在食管非重力位病变中更加明显。结论 FASTER辅助下的食管ESD较传统ESD更加安全和高效。

    Abstract:

    Objective To compare the efficacy of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) using the flexible auxiliary single-arm transluminal endoscopic robot (FASTER) with that of the traditional technique, and explore a safer and more efficient ESD operation method.Methods FASTER-assisted ESD and traditional ESD were used to operate in the isolated pig esophagus model. The differences of total procedure time, ESD time, the rate of direct-vision dissection,complete en bloc resection and complication rate between the two groups were compared and analyzed.Results The total procedure time [(19.2 ± 2.9) and (28.9 ± 8.2) min] and ESD time [(13.0 ± 2.9) and (21.6 ± 8.3) min] were significantly shorter in FASTER-assisted ESD group than those in traditional ESD group, the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.01); The rate of direct-vision dissection was significantly higher than that of the traditional ESD (96.2% and 65.4%), the difference was statistically significant (P = 0.014). Muscle layer injury rate was significantly lower than of the traditional group (19.2% and 69.2%), the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.01). There was no significant difference in complete en bloc resection rate and perforation rate between the two groups (P > 0.05). These advantages were more apparent in esophageal non-gravity lesions.Conclusion Esophageal ESD assisted by FASTER is safer and more efficient than traditional ESD.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

李清敏,张瑞昕,李茂生,季锐.柔性臂消化内镜手术机器人在食管内镜黏膜下剥离术中的应用效果[J].中国内镜杂志,2024,30(6):17-22

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2024-02-09
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2024-07-09
二维码
中国内镜杂志声明
关闭