Abstract:Objective To compare and analyze the clinical effect of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic technique and microscope-assisted treatment of lumbar disc herniation.Methods 60 patients with lumbar disc herniation from October 2017 to December 2019 were randomly divided into the experimental group treated with percutaneous transforaminal endoscopy and the control group treated with microscope-assisted treatment, there were 30 cases in each group. Analyzed the clinical treatment effects.Results The time of surgery and the hospitalization time of the experimental group were shorter than those of the control group, the incisive length of the experimental group was shorter than that of the control group, and intraoperative blood loss was less than that of the control group (P < 0.05). At 1 week after operation, the visual analogue scale (VAS) of experimental group was lower than that of the control group, the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score of experimental group was higher than that of the control group (P < 0.05); There were no significant differences in clinical excellent rate, the VAS and the JOA score at 1 and 3 months after operation between the groups (P > 0.05). There was 1 case of dural sac tear in the control group during the operation, repaired with absorbable suture. No intraoperative and postoperative complications occurred in the remaining patients.Conclusion Percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic technique of lumbar disc herniation can effectively shorten the surgical incision, reduce the blood loss during the operation, and can effectively reduce the pain of the patient in the short term after the operation, promote the recovery of the lumbar spine function of the patient, and can not increase the occurrence of adverse complications in the patient, it is worthy of clinical application.