内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗消化道早癌发生术后感染的危险因素分析
作者:
作者单位:

重庆医科大学附属第一医院 消化内科,重庆 400016

作者简介:

通讯作者:

姜政,E-mail:jiangz1753@163.com;Tel:13500328655

基金项目:


Analysis of risk factors of postoperative infection after endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastrointestinal carcinoma
Author:
Affiliation:

Department of Gastroenterology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016, China

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    目的 探讨内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)治疗消化道早癌发生术后感染的危险因素。方法 回顾性分析2018年11月-2021年11月该院83例实施ESD治疗的消化道早癌患者的临床资料,根据手术后是否发生感染分为术后未感染组(n = 60)和术后感染组(n = 23)。通过单因素分析及多因素Logistic回归分析ESD术后发生感染的危险因素,并构建ESD术后感染风险预测模型。结果 多因素Logistic回归分析显示,年龄(OR^ = 4.644,95%CI:1.087~19.843,P = 0.035)和术中穿孔(OR^ = 11.147,95%CI:2.136~5.168,P = 0.004)是消化道早癌患者ESD术后发生感染的危险因素。拟合优度检验:χ2 = 4.95,P = 0.763(P > 0.05);曲线下面积(AUC)为0.756(95%CI:0.636~0.875,P = 0.000),阳性预测率为62.2%,敏感度为69.6%,特异度为76.7%,临界值为0.303。结论 消化道早癌患者的年龄和手术过程中是否发生穿孔与ESD术后感染的发生紧密相关,该模型对于术后感染患者有良好的区分度和校准度,值得应用于临床。

    Abstract:

    Objective To investigate the risk factors of postoperative infection in patients with early gastrointestinal carcinoma treated by endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD).Methods The clinical data of patients diagnosed early gastrointestinal carcinoma treated by ESD from November 2018 to November 2021 were reviewed for retrospective analysis. 83 patients were included, and they were divided into postoperative non-infection group (n = 60) and postoperative infection group (n = 23) according to whether infection occurred after surgery. The risk factors of infection after ESD were analyzed by univariate analysis and multivariate Logistic regression analysis, and the risk prediction model of infection after ESD was established.Results The multivariate Logistic analysis showed that age (OR^ = 4.644, 95%CI: 1.087~19.843, P = 0.035) and intraoperative perforation (OR^ = 11.147, 95%CI:2.136~5.168, P = 0.004) were risk factors for infection after ESD in patients with early gastrointestinal carcinoma. Goodness of fit test: χ2 = 4.95, P = 0.763 (P > 0.05) and area under the curve (AUC) was 0.756 (95%CI: 0.636~0.875, P = 0.000), positive prediction rate was 62.2%, sensitivity was 69.6%, specificity was 76.7%, and the cut-off value was 0.303.Conclusion The age of patients with early gastrointestinal carcinoma and the occurrence of perforation during ESD are closely related to the occurrence of infection after ESD, and this model has good discrimination and calibration degree for patients liable to suffer postoperative infection, it is worthy of clinical application.

    表 4 影响ESD术后感染的多因素Logistic回归分析Table 4 Multivariate Logistic regression analysis of infection after ESD
    表 1 两组患者一般资料比较 例(%)Table 1 Comparison of general data between the two groups n (%)
    表 3 两组患者病理资料比较 例(%)Table 3 Comparison of pathological data between the two groups n (%)
    表 5 术后感染者不同临床表现的预后指标比较 例(%)Table 5 Comparison of prognostic indexes of different clinical manifestations in postoperative infected patients n (%)
    图 回归方程预测ESD术后感染的ROC曲线Fig.
    表 2 两组患者术中术后情况比较 例(%)Table 2 Comparison of intraoperative and postoperative conditions between the two groups n (%)
    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

郭新月,刘进,赵刚容,姜政.内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗消化道早癌发生术后感染的危险因素分析[J].中国内镜杂志,2022,28(12):44-50

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2022-01-08
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-01-01
二维码
中国内镜杂志声明
关闭