内镜自动染色水汽装置与常规染色方法在内镜化学染色中的应用效果比较

Comparsion of clinical effect of endoscopic automatic staining water vapor device and conventional staining method in endoscopic chemical staining

摘要:

目的 研发内镜自动染色水汽装置，对内镜水汽瓶进行改造，使内镜水汽与染色剂整合在一个装置内，通过转换钮控制内镜水汽和染色剂都分别通过内镜水汽管道进入消化道。并与常规染色方法进行对比，以此来验证内镜自动染色水汽装置的临床效果。方法 分为自动染色组与常规染色组两组，每组100例，选取靛胭脂及复方碘溶液作为化学染色剂，对比两组染色剂的使用量和操作时间。结果 自动染色组碘液使用剂量和操作时间明显少于常规染色组[碘液使用剂量分别为（9.53±1.01）和（10.73±1.82）mL，操作时间分别为（16.10±2.46）和（25.45±2.43）s]，两组比较，差异均有统计学意义（P < 0.05）；自动染色组靛胭脂使用剂量和操作时间明显少于常规染色组[靛胭脂使用剂量分别为（8.75±1.20）和（9.95±1.43）mL，操作时间分别为（8.60±1.35）和（10.45±2.01）s]，两组比较，差异均有统计学意义（P < 0.05）。结论 内镜自动染色水汽装置可以用于内镜下化学染色，使内镜下染色既高效又便捷。

Abstract:

Objective To develop an endoscope automatic dying water vapor device with the staff of the endoscopy center, reconstruct the endoscope water bottle, integrate the endoscope water vapor and the dye in one device, control the endoscope water vapor and the dye through the conversion button to enter the digestive tract through the endoscope water vapor pipe.Methods Routine staining and multi-functional automatic staining were divided into two groups, 100 cases in each. Indigo carmine and compound iodine solution were selected as the chemical staining agent. The use amount and operation time of the staining agent were compared between routine staining group and automatic staining group.Results The dosage and operation time of esophageal iodine staining in the experimental group and the control group were (9.53 ± 1.01) mL and (10.73 ± 1.82) mL respectively, and the operation time was (16.10 ± 2.46) s and (25.45 ± 2.43) s respectively. In terms of dosage and operation time, the experimental group was significantly less than the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05); The dosage and operation time of indigo carmine in the experimental group and the control group were (8.75 ± 1.20) mL and (9.95 ± 1.43) mL respectively, and the operation time was (8.60 ± 1.35) s and (10.45 ± 2.01) s respectively. Similarly, the dosage and operation time of the experimental group were significantly less than those of the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05）.Conclusion The water vapor device of endoscopic automatic staining can be used for endoscopic chemical staining, which makes endoscopic staining both efficient and convenient.