鼻内镜下改良鼻中隔矫正术治疗创伤性C型歪鼻合并鼻中隔偏曲的疗效评估
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

[通信作者] 梁小军,E-mail:18983204377@163.com;Tel:18983204377

通讯作者:

基金项目:


Comparison of clinical efficacy of the nasal endoscope assisted nasal vestibule incision and conventional open surgery treatment for traumatic deviated nasal deformity
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    摘要:目的??探讨鼻内镜下改良鼻中隔矫正术治疗创伤性C型歪鼻合并鼻中隔偏曲的疗效。方法 选取陆军军医大学第二附属医院2013年5月-2018年12月收治的创伤性C型歪鼻伴鼻中隔偏曲患者60例,根据手术方式的不同,在患者知情同意的情况下分为研究组(采用鼻内镜改良鼻中隔矫正术辅助鼻前庭切口方式)与对照组(采用传统鼻中隔黏膜下切除术方式),每组各30例。比较两组患者的临床疗效、治疗期间的相关临床指标、术后并发症发生情况、术后鼻阻力和手术前后的外鼻测量值差异。结果 研究组患者治疗总有效率(93.33%)明显高于对照组(70.00%),差异有统计学意义(P?

    Abstract:

    Abstract: Objective?To investigate the comparison of clinical efficacy of the nasal endoscope assisted nasal vestibule incision and conventional open surgery treatment for traumatic deviated nasal deformity.?Methods?To screening 60 cases of patients from May 2013 to December 2018 with traumatic deviated nasal deformity as research subjects. 60 cases were divided into study group with 30 cases and control group with 30 cases. Patients in control group were given conventional open surgery treatment and patients in study group were given the nasal endoscope assisted nasal vestibule incision, then the two groups were compared in terms of clinical efficacy, relevant clinical indicators during treatment, postoperative complications, postoperative nasal resistance and external nasal measurement before and after surgery.?Results?The clinical efficacy in study group was higher than the control group (P?

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

胡喜,邓安春,王昶,梁小军.鼻内镜下改良鼻中隔矫正术治疗创伤性C型歪鼻合并鼻中隔偏曲的疗效评估[J].中国内镜杂志,2020,26(5):68-73

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2021-02-04
二维码
中国内镜杂志声明
关闭