Abstract:Abstract: Objective?To investigate whether preoperatively assessed MRI parameters might be of prognostic value for prediction of functional outcome and return to sports in arthroscopic treatment of chronic patellar tendinopathy (PT).?Methods?A prospective cohort study was conducted including 28 cases (4 female and 24 male competitive athletes) underwent arthroscopic patellar release (APR) due to chronic PT. The mean age was 28.2 years old (range, 18 ~ 49 years old) at the time of surgery, and the mean follow-up period was 4.2 years old (range, 2.2 ~ 10.4 years old). Preoperatively assessed MRI parameters included bone marrow edema (BME) of the inferior patellar pole, patellar tendon thickening, infrapatellar fat pad (IFP) edema, and infrapatellar bursitis. Prevalences of preoperative MRI findings were correlated to functional outcome scores in order to determine statistically significant predictors.?Results?All the athletes regained their preinjury sports levels. Athletes featuring postoperative IFP edema showed significantly inferior modified Blazina score (0.6 ± 0.1) vs (0.2 ± 0.1), single assessment numeric evaluation (SANE) (86.0 ± 8.8) vs (94.3 ± 7.5), and visual analogue scale (VAS) (1.0 ± 0.2) vs (0.3 ± 0.1) compared to subjects without IFP edema (P < 0.05). Return to sports required a mean of (4.0 ± 1.2) months. On average, patients with IFP edema needed significantly more time to return to sports than subjects without IFP edema (6.5 vs 2.8 months; P < 0.05). The simultaneous presence of BME and IFP edema was associated with significantly inferior outcomes by means of the Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment questionnaire for patients with patellar tendinopathy (VISA) (88.1 ± 11.9) vs (98.6 ± 4.2), SANE (84.3 ± 10.2) vs (93.1 ± 8.3), and VAS (1.3 ± 0.4) vs (0.3 ± 0.1) compared to an isolated BME or isolated IFP edema.?Conclusion?Preoperative IFP edema alone or simultaneous BME and IFP edema on preoperative MRI were associated with inferior functional outcome and delayed return to sports. Knowledge of these predictive factors might improve risk stratification, individualize treatment and postoperative rehabilitation, and contribute to improve clinical outcome.