不同肠道准备方法对胶囊内镜检查的效果研究*
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

胡红松,E-mail:hongsong-hu@hotmail.com

通讯作者:

基金项目:

广东省医学基金项目(No:B2016022);深圳市科技计划项目(No:JCYJ20150402164314694);深圳市龙岗区科技计划项目(No:YLWS20150514163742468)


Comparison of different bowel preparation methods for capsule endoscopy*
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    摘要:目的  探寻胶囊内镜(CE)检查的最佳肠道准备方法。方法 102例拟行CE检查的患者随机分为3组,A组(n =40):检查前1天21:00口服聚乙二醇电解质散137.12 g,溶于2 000 ml水中,检查前4 h口服聚乙二醇电解质散68.56 g,溶于1 000 ml水中;B组(n =32):检查前4 h口服聚乙二醇电解质散205.68 g,溶于3 000 ml水中;C组(n =30):检查前4 h口服20%甘露醇500 ml,后饮水2 500 ml。3组患者均吞服胶囊后立即吞服二甲基硅油120 mg,比较各组患者副反应发生率、小肠清洁度和小肠通过时间。结果 3组副反应发生率分别为15.00%、15.63%及16.67%,差异无统计学意义(P >0.05);B、C两组小肠清洁度均优于A组,差异具有统计学意义(均P <0.05),C组略优于B组,差异无统计学意义(P >0.05);A组小肠通过时间明显长于B、C两组(均P <0.05),而B、C两组间比较差异无统计学意义(P >0.05)。结论 清肠剂顿服效果优于分次口服,20.00%甘露醇500 ml顿服是一种清肠效果好、副反应较少且经济的肠道准备方法,值得临床推广。

    Abstract:

    Abstract: Objective To explore the optimal bowel preparation for capsule endoscopy (CE). Methods 102 patients were recruited for CE and randomly divided into 3 groups. The group A (n = 40) : patients received polyethylene glycol electrolyte powder (PEG) 137.12 g dissolved in 2 000 ml water at 21:00 one day prior to CE, and taken PEG 68.56 g dissolved in 1 000 ml of water four hours before the procedure. Group B (n = 32): patients received PEG 205.68 g dissolved in 3 000 ml of water four hours prior to CE. Group C (n = 30): patients used a 500 ml 20% mannitol and 2 500 ml water bowel preparation four hours prior to CE. All patients were treated with 120 mg simethicone immediately after swallowing CE. The incidences of adverse events, small-bowel preparation quality and transit time were analyzed. Results The adverse effects rate in each group was similar (15.00%, 15.63% vs 16.67%, P > 0.05). The small-bowel preparation quality was better in both B and C groups than A group (P < 0.05). In the C Group, small-bowel preparation quality was slightly better than the B group, but the difference was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). In comparison with patients in both B and C groups, those in A group had a longer small-bowel transit time (P < 0.05), whereas there was no significant difference between B and C group (P > 0.05). Conclusion Bowel cleansing effect was better in single dose regimen than split dose protocol. The single dose regimen of 500 ml 20% Mannitol for bowel preparation is suitable prior to CE.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

袁小刚,黄艳娟,陈晓红,项立,胡红松.不同肠道准备方法对胶囊内镜检查的效果研究*[J].中国内镜杂志,2018,24(2):23-27

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2017-07-24
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2018-02-28
二维码
中国内镜杂志声明
关闭